Sunday, May 25, 2008

Washington Post: Channel Changer

Channel ChangerThree Years Ago, Reggie Hudlin Came To Save a Troubled BET. But Has He?

By Teresa WiltzWashington Post Staff WriterSunday, May 4, 2008; M01

NEW YORK -- To understand the irony, skip back four years: Reginald Hudlin, Hollywood director and comic book nerd, is ensconced with his close friend, firebrand cartoonist Aaron McGruder, gleefully penning a graphic novel, "Birth of a Nation." The book features as its villain the network mogul "John Roberts" -- a black billionaire with a complete willingness to sell African Americans down the river to make a buck. Not coincidentally, "John Roberts" looks a lot like billionaire Bob Johnson, the founder of Black Entertainment Television.
Skip forward to the present: Now Hudlin's dividing his time between Los Angeles and New York as BET's president of entertainment, the man in charge of the images tumbling from the cable network's airwaves. His critics blame him for serving up a steady diet of the same old same old: poisonous, stereotypical images of blacks, specifically rap videos featuring scantily clad vixens and blinged-out gangstas.
On the Internet, Hudlin is the target of a savage cartoon sendup, portrayed as the morally challenged programming head for "Black Evil Television" -- a parody created by none other than McGruder, his former friend. And in Washington, protesters camped for months outside the home of Hudlin's boss -- network CEO Debra Lee -- each and every weekend, chanting "Enough is enough."
"Right now, Reginald Hudlin and Debra Lee preside over a media empire that perpetuates every negative stereotype about black men and black women that we fought against," says the Rev. Delman Coates, the Prince George's County pastor behind the campaign against BET. "And they have to be held accountable.
"The reality is, if Reginald Hudlin were white, more black leaders and more black organizations would be raising an outcry. But for some reason we give black people a pass for participating in our own exploitation."
Last month, Coates, in conjunction with the Parents Television Council and onetime BET video programmer Paul Porter of Industry Ears, released a study analyzing adult content on two BET video shows, "106 & Park" and "Rap City," along with MTV's "Sucker Free" -- prime-time programs that they charge are marketed to and viewed by children. Among the conclusions: In March, on the shows cited, there was one instance of adult content -- references to drugs, sex or violence -- every 38 seconds.
The next step in the "Enough Is Enough" campaign: pressuring BET advertisers to pull their sponsorship.
All of which says: It's a tough time to be Reggie Hudlin, the supposed savior of BET.
Mention that to Hudlin, and he bristles. To his mind, BET's critics are haters who can't appreciate the hard work he's put into the network. The rap videos, he says, are but a small portion of the programming that the network offers. "To me, when you look at the portfolio [of shows], the intent is very clear," he says over lunch in Manhattan, looking aggrieved. "So why are you criticizing me?"
As Hudlin sees it, he's fighting the good fight, trying to change the public image of African Americans, one show at a time, with family-oriented programming such as the newly announced gospel video countdown, "106 & Gospel"; "Black Panther," an animated series based on a comic book he writes; and "Brutha," a reality show about a group of singing siblings trying to make it in the industry.
"This is a place where you can effect a world of difference, literally a world," says Hudlin, who with his brother Warrington made the popular movies "House Party" and "Boomerang" in the early '90s. "You can just sit around and be a complainer. Or you can roll up your sleeves and get to work."
Those sleeves would be cashmere, attached to turtlenecks color-coded to match his horn-rims: brown one day, black the next. Hudlin's on the short side, broad in the chest. Gray streaks his hair and goatee, but he retains the air of the baby-faced hipster he once was.
Talk to him about work, and in particular BET, and he's defensive and uptight, taking umbrage at the questions asked, intensely focused on spin. "You're bumming me out with your questions," he tells a reporter. It's as if he takes the criticisms personally. But get Hudlin talking about anything else -- the "Black Panther" series that he writes for Marvel Comics, getting married in Jamaica, the wonder of his little girl's traffic-stopping 'fro -- and he loosens up considerably. His sense of humor floats to the surface.
At 46, Hudlin is of the same generation that shaped Barack Obama, riding the cusp between Boomers and Gen X'ers, post civil rights movement and "post-racial." He comfortably straddles the line between Harvard (where he earned his bachelor's degree) and the 'hood (East St. Louis, Ill., where he grew up), a hip-hop head weaned on P-Funk and Prince, sci-fi and Marvel Comics.
Now he's riding the cusp between the old BET and the one he envisions for the future. Today, Hudlin and his network are at a critical juncture.
After nearly three decades in the business, BET is battling its image as a purveyor of stereotypes at the same time it's trying to position itself as a global player. Last month the network launched BET UK, its first real venture into international waters. (Next stop: South Africa in 2009.)
Now, after nearly three years on the job, Hudlin says he has started turning around the network, pushing it to the next level, from a surplus of music videos and syndicated reruns to scripted, original programming. At the same time, he and Lee point out that they've got a business to run, and that they'd be foolish to ignore the ones buttering their bread: that prized demographic of 18-to-34-year-olds. Young people, who, he says, "get it." BET's critics, he says, do not.
"What we do involves black youth culture, and black youth culture has always been vilified," Hudlin says. "That's the business we're in. I understand there's always going to be some level of vilification . . . and I'm not having it."
Hudlin is squeezed between making profits and making a difference. Observes a BET producer who declined to be identified for fear of losing his job: "You can criticize BET all you want, but it's about money. . . . You put all these high-minded, socially conscious programs on and your profits dip, you're right out of there."
BET, founded in Washington in 1980, emerged in the aftermath of the black-power '70s, riding a crest of hopes and expectations as the first black network. In the early days -- also the early days of rap -- the network was a family affair, with all ages tuning in. It was "Video Soul" with a genial Donnie Simpson and the wholesome Sherry Carter. It was nighttime newscasts with a sober-looking Ed Gordon. It was talk shows and Teen Summits and Mandela Freedom Fund Telethons. But along the way, things shifted. Newscasts shrank to sound bites. Hip-hop, or at least, commercial rap, morphed into something else, something harder and crasser. Videos took on a dominant role.
Being the first means being saddled with a certain amount of baggage. "BET is unique because it is the custodian of the airwaves for all black people," says Hudlin's brother Warrington. "It is a burden, a double standard. History places that on you. . . . BET hasn't done anything that VH1 and MTV haven't done. But people don't expect VH1 to be our channel."
Age-old dilemma. As Langston Hughes pointed out in 1926, "The Negro artist works against an undertow of sharp criticism and misunderstanding from his own group and unintentional bribes from the whites. 'Oh, be respectable, write about nice people, show how good we are,' say the Negroes. 'Be stereotyped, don't go too far, don't shatter our illusions about you, don't amuse us too seriously. We will pay you,' say the whites."Former Friends
At a recent daily taping of "106 & Park," BET's video countdown show, a plethora of hip-hop players and wannabes float in and out of the studios on West 57th Street in Manhattan. A giant screen displays rapper Rick Ross's latest video, "The Boss." In it, two half-naked women crawl over Ross's massive, tattooed chest, interspersed with dreamy clips of diamond-encrusted rings and stacks and stacks of hundred-dollar bills.
Ross raps:
Who gives a [expletive] what a hater gotta say
I made a couple million dollars last year dealing [expletive]
The video fades out. In its place is a segment featuring black-and-white newsreel footage of Martin Luther King Jr., the Mall and a narrator intoning, "I am the March on Washington."
But it's the gangsta-rap videos that had BET critics such as Coates, of Mount Ennon Baptist Church in Clinton, camped outside Lee's Northwest home from last August to mid-April on weekends, chanting, "BET, SUCH A DISGRACE! BET, UPLIFT THE RACE!" (A New York-based sister church similarly is still protesting each weekend outside the Manhattan home of Philippe Dauman, CEO of BET's parent company, Viacom. Dauman declined to be interviewed for this article.)
People protesting on his boss's front lawn is just one of Hudlin's problems. Ratings have dropped significantly, according to Derek Baine, senior analyst for SNL Kagan: Average household daily viewership dropped from 353,000 in 2006 to 316,000 in 2007. (But a popular show like Keyshia Cole's does much better.) The network reaches nearly 90 million households.
Then there's Paul Porter, a former BET video programming director who left the network in 2002, who charges that payola was, and is, a regular part of transactions at the network. On any given Friday, he says, he would receive a FedEx box stuffed with as much as $15,000 in cash. (Porter now heads Industry Ears, an advocacy group that participated in the "Enough Is Enough" BET survey.)
Hudlin vehemently denies any knowledge of, or involvement in, alleged payola at BET. As for Coates's protest, he says, "it's such misplaced aggression that doesn't deal with the root of the problem. They're attacking someone [Lee] who cares a great deal about all the things that they care about."
He'd rather talk about his successes: "We have expanded the breadth and depth of programming on the network in a very short time. We're far from done. But I think the work we've done so far on the network should be celebrated."
As evidence, Hudlin points back to a 2005 telethon to raise money for Katrina victims; a two-part town hall special, "Hip Hop vs. America," aired in the wake of the Don Imus brouhaha; a reality TV show featuring R&B starlet Keyshia Cole and her dysfunctional family; a documentary series produced by writer Nelson George, "American Gangster"; an "American Idol"-style gospel show, "Sunday Best"; and "BET Honors," an awards show for prominent African Americans.
Between 2003-2007, BET has doubled its programming budget. Last year, Hudlin and his crew announced plans to release an impressive lineup of original programming -- 16 shows, including an animated series about the Carthaginian general Hannibal to be produced by Vin Diesel. In April they announced programming for the 2008-09 season that includes a courtroom reality show and a dating show. It'll also boost its news programming with two shows: "The Truth With Jeff Johnson," a news talk show, and "Unreported," an investigative series.
But several shows announced last year have yet to air or have died quick deaths. "Judge Mooney," a sendup of courtroom shows featuring veteran comic Paul Mooney, was canceled days before its scheduled October debut. The ambitious "Wifey," a drama starring Queen Latifah as a widowed music industry executive, remains unscheduled. The pilot was directed by Hudlin, an unusual move for a network head.
To be sure, television programming is an exercise in experimentation. As Lee put it, "Some things fall by the wayside," while Hudlin insists that most of the network's pilots do make it on-air.
BET's shows that have aired are a mixed bag.
"Take the Cake," a live interactive daily game show starring Tocarra of "America's Next Top Model," only lasted a season. "Hell Date," a mash-up of dating shows that features a dwarf in a Devil suit, doesn't exactly advance the cause for quality programming. "We Got to Do Better" has come and gone, as has "Socially Offensive Behavior," a kind of "Candid Camera" for the 21st century, starring comic D.L. Hughley. "Read a Book," a satirical animated short by Washington rapper Bomani, came under fire by critics who said the video perpetrated negative stereotypes, and inspired the "Enough Is Enough" campaign.
A firestorm of controversy started last fall when BET debuted "We Got to Do Better," based on a Web site, "Hot Ghetto Mess," which casts a jaundiced eye at tacky African Americans, taking the "America's Funniest Home Videos" approach.
Critics like Gina McCauley, an Austin attorney, charged that the show catered to offensive stereotypes. She launched an online protest with her blog, "What About Our Daughters," and some Internet advertisers pulled their support for the show.
Observes Hudlin's mentor, the television pioneer Steve Bochco: "He's had to completely change the culture there, which is always a complicated chore. He has to grapple with a very, very anemic budget. When you look at what he's been able to do and the context of those challenges, you have to say he's doing a wonderful job. He needs more time to accomplish what he's set out to do. You don't turn those ships on a dime, big heavy corporate cargo vessels."
Hudlin has hurt feelings along the way. Mooney says his show was abruptly pulled without explanation and Hudlin never returned his calls. "I thought he was a king," Mooney says. "I had no idea he was a slave." (Both Hudlin and Lee maintain that the show was killed because it didn't test well with focus groups.)
His feet are to the flame. A few years back, Hudlin joined forces with comic strip artist McGruder to produce the cartoon version of McGruder's "Boondocks" on the Cartoon Network. The show takes frequent potshots at BET.
Today Hudlin and McGruder, once close friends, no longer speak. And Hudlin himself became the target of two "Boondocks" episodes. (The episodes, which the Cartoon Network decided not to release, are now making the rounds in the Afrosphere.) Hudlin is cast as the bow-tie-wearing "Weggie Rudlin," who declares, "My Harvard education tells us that our goal is to take all the [expletive] reality TV shows that MTV made five years ago and make them black!"
And yes, Hudlin still has an executive-producer credit on the show. And no, he's not going to talk about what happened, or how he feels about being skewered by his onetime friend/protege. Nor will McGruder comment.
The comedian Orlando Jones, director and producer of the upcoming BET animated sketch show "BUFU," says Hudlin "did everything right. He went to Harvard. Now he's been charged to change the stereotypes for people who think BET is the chitlin circuit network. He's like, 'I've never done anything in my life that's stereotypical, and now I'm that guy?' "In the 'Ghet-to'
Hudlin grew up in East St. Louis, Ill., a city with a rich artistic past: Lillian Gish, Josephine Baker, Miles Davis, dance pioneer Katherine Dunham and bluesman Albert King all called it home. But by the time Hudlin came of age in the late '70s, East St. Louis, once dubbed an "All America City," was rapidly unraveling, the victim of riots, factory closings and virulent street gangs. A city that he affectionately sends up in "Birth of a Nation," where he and McGruder imagined what would happen if East St. Louis seceded from the union. (Hint: chaos.)
Hudlin's description of East St. Louis? "Ghet-to."
Still, his is hardly your standard by-the-bootstraps story. Hudlin's mother was an educator. His father, who died in 1998, was an insurance agent who served as president of the Chamber of Commerce, ran the local community college -- and turned down an invitation to run for mayor.
"My family was very educated; we have people with PhDs," says Hudlin over lunch at an upscale midtown Manhattan brasserie. He pauses, and then adds this caveat, as if to establish his 'hood bona fides: "But we collected grease on a stove. Both my parents were real products of the Depression: Real, real hard work, never throw something away that you can use again."
From an early age, he knew that he wanted to be a filmmaker. As a kid, he spent hours drawing comic books and hanging out at the community arts center that Dunham created in the heart of the ghetto, studying martial arts while his mom took dance classes. Films entranced him: Bob Fosse's "All That Jazz," Charles Burnett's "Killer of Sheep." But it was Ken Russell's rock opera movie "Tommy" that clinched it for him: the surreal rush of music and imagery.
With visions of directing a funk opera starring George Clinton and Parliament-Funkadelic, he headed off to Harvard, where he majored in visual and environmental studies, a multidisciplinary honors program that combined film, photography, graphic arts and architecture. After college, he joined up with his older brother Warrington, a Yale grad who was working as an independent filmmaker.
"I was doing work that was important, but not commercial," says Warrington, co-founder of the Black Filmmaker Foundation. "He said, 'What you're doing is good, but it's about time to make some money.' He always had a much stronger commercial instinct."
But Hollywood is notoriously fickle. After his film successes, Hudlin turned to TV, directing shows including Bochco's "City of Angels," "Bernie Mac" and his good buddy Chris Rock's "Everybody Hates Chris." Rock says he was a little surprised when Hudlin took the BET gig.
"He's got good taste," Rock says. "There's the Reggie who thinks like a director, and the Reggie who thinks like an exec. On the one hand, he's got real artistic taste. And then on the other hand, he's got real pop taste, 'This'll sell, this'll work.' "'Ching-Ching'
Cold, hard commerce is in the house.
From up on high in the Hammerstein Ballroom, in a box reserved for corporate muckety-mucks, Hudlin sits, head bobbing to the beat, taking in the cross-pollination of hip-hop and fashion, of industry and art. There are dudes lining up along the front row, doing the retro rap thing, all flattops and neon, looking just like Kid 'n Play did when Hudlin directed them in "House Party." Hudlin spots them and laughs.
Here, at the taping of BET's "Rip the Runway," booty-shaking is in short, and tasteful, supply. Instead, cash is the theme du jour. Pharrell, backed up by N.E.R.D., is rapping about "hundred-dollar bills" while models sporting ruffled Zac Posen evening gowns prowl the catwalk, affecting a studied indifference.
Then there's Missy Elliott, plugging her new single, chanting, "Ching-ching, getting paid over here," as models sporting duds from her fashion line bounce around the runway. From there, Flo Rida takes to the stage, name-checking Nelly's line of Apple Bottom jeans while models strut and preen, sporting, um, Apple Bottom jeans.
Over the course of the night, Snoop Dogg and Nelly, accompanied by their entourages, make their way up to the box, to pay their respects to Hudlin and Lee. To kiss the ring.
At the end of the day, it's all about doing business.
var comments_url = "http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/02/AR2008050200936_Comments.html" ;
var article_id = "AR2008050200936" ;

PAT BUCHANAN: TWO AMERICAS?

PAT BUCHANAN: TWO AMERICAS?

Divide and conquer is a stratagem that deserves a timely and well deserved death. At this crucial time in our history, when we as a nation can come together to regain our moral and economic standing in this world; some are trying, as John Kerry warned in 2004, to take us back “to two Americas – separate and unequal.”

Kerry’s warning echoed the Cassandra-esque prediction of the Kerner Commission. Tragically, like Cassandra’s exhortations, both prescient admonishments seem to have fallen on some deaf and deluded ears.

In a country where the socially constructed partition, better known as race, trumps class, sexuality, and gender; this stratagem is being used to the hilt by anachronisms like Pat Buchanan, “Southern Strategy Republicans”, and sadly, some within the Democratic Party. Even worse, many in the media are complicit and willing co-conspirators, abandoning their responsibility.

The attempt of some to paint all African Americans with the same “black brush” is having some effect. However, most forward minded people are not falling for the “okie doke”.

The attempt to link Barack Obama to others via “guilt by association” is an embarrassment to those who are doing so. Never in our history has one man been linked to another as in the case of Obama and his former Pastor Jeremiah Wright. Moreover, this stratagem’s blatant one handed usage is galling. This double-standard, which renders McCain and Rodham-Clinton immune, disgusts most fair minded folk.

In addition, Pat Buchanan’s recent “ungrateful blacks” spiel said in light of the Obama/Wright fiasco has gone mostly unrebutted by the complicit media. His postulations that:

"First, America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known.

Second, no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans. Untold trillions have been spent since the 60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream."

Buchanan's comments obscure the fact that African Americans and their allies have had to fight for whatever freedoms have been gained. The many programs he mentions have helped ALL AMERICANS, especially European Americans. Are his words to go unchallenged? Will MSNBC denounce his "post slavery syndrome" mentality?

Furthermore, such statements play into the “ungrateful blacks”/”grateful immigrant” faulty syllogism. As demonstrated in California’s primary, many Asian and Latino new arrivals did not vote for Obama due to the effectiveness of divide and conquer propaganda and institutionalized racism.

Also, such statements play into the “lazy blacks”/”hardworking blue collar” faulty syllogism; obfuscating the fact that many African Americans, until recently, held most blue collar jobs. And that the reduction of black and white participation in such jobs is due partly to Corporate America’s love affair with exploitable illegal workers and outsourcing to cheaper labor markets.

The propaganda machine urges people to vote their aspirations and not their interests. The propaganda machine plays on people’s fears, prejudices, and resentments. The propaganda machine creates and reinforces “two Americas” and pits “us” against them”…black” vs. “everybody else”. As if black people can’t be and aren’t anything else; i.e., women, working class, rich, poor, college educated and as if these other aspects of their personhood bear no impact on how they vote. Now is not the time for such chicanery. The “fierce urgency of now” necessitates that we discard such outmoded behavior and embrace change.

In conclusion, in the two Americas, historically, only one has gotten to own and broadcast its point of view. Luckily for us, our media is not monolithic and neither are we as a people. Effective media presents various points of view and from it, people are free to come to their own determinations.

This election season is proving that the two Americas syndrome still exists but it is also showing that it is going the way of the dinosaur and we have the opportunity to evolve into ONE AMERICA. Will we?Paul PorterIndustry Ears

THE RAP ON RAP BET/MTV Study

Rap on Rap: MTV and BET Music Video AnalysisReport rips adult content in rap videosBy Cheryl WetzsteinWashington TimesApril 11, 2008

Three music-video shows that air during daytime or early evening hours are heavily laced with sexual imagery, explicit language, violence and drug use, a television watchdog organization says in a report released yesterday. This kind of adult content should not be marketed to children, said the Rev. Delman L. Coates, founder of the Enough is Enough Campaign. "It's these images of black men as gangsters and thugs, and criminals [and] black women as being hypersexualized — which are actually long-standing stereotypes of black people that have endured since slavery — that I felt really needed to be challenged," Mr. Coates said, in explaining why he started the campaign last summer and has been leading weekly protests at entertainment executives' homes. The Enough is Enough Campaign and other groups, like Industry Ears and National Congress of Black Women (NCBW), are "equally disturbed about the marketing and distribution of often times what amounts to soft pornographic themes to children and youth," Mr. Coates said at a press conference yesterday. "And that's really what it is, a kind of coarsening of American popular culture," he said. The three shows, which aired on Black Entertainment Television (BET) or MTV in December and last month, offered viewers offensive or adult content about once every minute, said the report, "The Rap on Rap," from the Parents Television Council (PTC). In comparison, prime time broadcast "family hour" programming has instances of violent, profane or sexual content about once every five minutes, PTC President Tim Winter said. The three shows analyzed were "Sucker Free on MTV," "106 & Park" and "Rap City" on BET. The shows appeared during afternoon or early evening hours. "Sucker Free on MTV" music videos were rated TV-14, which advises that parental guidance is "strongly advised," while most of the BET shows carried the milder TV-PG rating. The PTC study was requested by Mr. Coates' group to quantify their concerns about excessive sexuality, foul language, violence, drugs and other antisocial imagery. Last September, BET aired a three-part series called "Hip Hop vs. America" that looked at hip hop's relationship with criminality, its treatment of black women and "the pride, embarrassment and confusion blacks often feel over hip hop's public airing of the community's 'dirty laundry.' " "This music is supposed to be about what we open our doors and see when we go out into the streets," said hip hop artist T.I. "If you don't change what's going on in these neighborhoods, you can't change what's going on in this music." "We can't change our words," Russell Simmons, founder of Def Jam Recordings, told the BET series. "We can't change our ideas. We can't hide all your dirt. We have to make mirrors of your dirt. So if we say things that offend you, you have to suck it up and listen closely. Why are we saying it? The truth is that these words and this language is going to be a critical way to paint a picture of our society." Telephone calls yesterday to Viacom, MTV and BET were not returned by deadline. However, Viacom President and Chief Executive Philippe Dauman as well as BET Chairman and Chief Executive Debra L. Lee both said in letters to Mr. Coates that they share his concerns about negative portrayals of blacks in the media. In his letter, Mr. Dauman promised the company would continue to "engage our audiences in constructive dialogue" while Miss Lee said BET programming guidelines do not allow "programming that endorses or condones illegal drugs or gratuitous violence" and identifies "words that are forbidden on our channel." E. Faye Williams, chair of the National Congress of Black Women, said yesterday her NCBW predecessor, the late C. Delores Tucker, had been protesting the music industry's negative stereotyping and degradation of women for more than a decade. It's time to take the protest to the sponsors of these videos and programs, Miss Williams said. The NCBW and its allies represent 15 million members, she said, "and we know how to buy selectively." READ FULL REPORT

Monday, April 10, 2006

Payola inquiry chills radio playlists

Payola inquiry chills radio playlists

N.Y. official's action targeted bribery but has discouraged programming of new songs

By Charles Duhigg
April 9, 2006
Last summer, before New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer took on the music industry over pay-for-play allegations, the man who chooses songs for the Los Angeles station KKBT-FM started each week enthusiastically brainstorming about what new tunes to add to his playlist.
Today, KKBT program director Tom Calococci still brainstorms. But he feels pressure to take fewer creative risks.
"No programmer wants to draw attention by choosing songs too far outside the mainstream," said Calococci, who says fear of regulatory scrutiny has made radio executives less willing to play emerging bands. Calococci still plays new music, he said, but "Spitzer has put a chill on everything."
Spitzer's inquiry, which alleged that music companies illegally paid radio programmers to play certain songs, was intended to make the airwaves more of a meritocracy. Without pay-for-play, Spitzer argued, consumers would hear the music that programmers liked best, rather than tunes that the major record labels bribed disc jockeys to air.
But Spitzer's crusade might be having the opposite effect. Many programmers say that fear of regulatory scrutiny has scared them into choosing fewer new songs for radio play. Instead, stations are sticking to older, more tried-and-true tunes that seem less likely to prompt speculation that money changed hands.
Indeed, research shows that listeners are hearing fewer new songs on the radio today than they were a year ago. In the first quarter of 2006, "active rock" stations added 23 percent fewer new songs to their playlists than during the same period in 2005, according to trade publication Radio & Records. Pop stations added 14 percent fewer songs, additions on urban/hip-hop stations dropped by 16 percent and the number of new songs played by "adult contemporary" stations fell by 17 percent.
Those dips occurred even as the number of new album releases increased, according to Nielsen SoundScan.
"These are really big drops," said Cyndee Maxwell, a Radio & Records executive who helped survey more than 867 radio stations. "I've never seen decreases that big."
In the wake of Spitzer's investigation, radio companies have launched internal inquiries and, in instances of wrongdoing, fired and reprimanded scores of programmers. Almost every radio chain has instituted new policies regarding gifts and payments. Also, the Federal Communications Commission has launched its own investigation to determine whether radio companies should lose their broadcast licenses if evidence of corruption exists.
That has left many programmers with the impression that if their names are so much as mentioned in connection with pay-to-play, their jobs will be at risk.
More than a dozen radio programmers interviewed for this article - almost all of whom requested anonymity because they feared that discussing pay-for-play would endanger their jobs - say the slowdown in airing new songs isn't official policy. Rather, it is a precaution individual programmers are taking to avoid raising suspicion about their motives.
"I don't want anyone to look at my playlists six months from now and speculate about why I added a particular song, when our competition didn't add it," said one programmer. "People have been fired for less."
That sentiment is typical, say industry insiders.
"There is an overall fear among programmers that I've never encountered before," said Steven Strick, who compiles data on rock stations for Radio & Records. "These investigations by Spitzer and the FCC cast suspicion on almost everything. How stations choose music has changed in a fundamental way."
To be sure, the recent shift is part of a broader trend toward homogenization and repetitive airplay that has been under way for the past decade as station ownership has consolidated. But programmers say those shifts have accelerated in the past six months, after Spitzer's investigations were disclosed.
What's more, stations are less willing to participate in legitimate promotions, such as concert ticket giveaways and contests, that are popular with listeners.
"If I want to accept 25 CDs to give away on air, I have to forward paperwork all the way up to the vice president," said Bill Weston, program director at WMMR-FM in Philadelphia, where new policies about gifts and promotions have been drafted. "The new rules take forever. It's hardly worth the trouble."
All this worries record companies and music aficionados. Radio remains one of the few media that can introduce audiences to new music and spur huge album sales. Changes in how stations choose songs directly affect which musical genres survive and how many up-and-coming bands record labels sign, say executives.
Charles Duhigg writes for the Los Angeles Times. Copyright © 2006, The Baltimore Sun Get Sun home delivery

Thursday, April 06, 2006

Ameirica's top billing Radio stations

Thursday, April 6, 2006
WLTW/New York Remains America's Top Biller

The Clear Channel AC is once again in first place among America's biggest-billing radio stations, BIAfn reports. The station saw $68.3 million in revenue during 2005, while CBS Radio Alternative KROQ/Los Angeles rolled into second place after a huge revenue gain of 11.6%, billing $67.6 million for the year. KROQ swaps places with CBS sibling News WINS/New York, which slipped to third place with an estimated 2005 billing of $60.8 million.

The overall top 10 saw little change, although Tribune News/Talk WGN/Chicago took the 10th spot as Clear Channel AC KOST/L.A. dipped from No. 10 to No. 12. "The lackluster radio business environment in 2005 did not allow for any major shifts in the lineup of the top 10 grossing radio stations," said BIAfn VP Mark Fratrik. "Even if a station generated substantial improvements in their ratings, its ability to quickly turn those larger audiences into significantly larger revenue was made more difficult because advertisers are lukewarm on radio overall."

Top 10 Billing Stations - 2005 Revenue
WLTW/New York
$68.3 million
KROQ/Los Angeles
$67.6 million
WINS/New York
$60.8 million
KFI/Los Angeles
$59.3 million
KPWR/Los Angeles
$57.9 million
WCBS-AM/N.Y.
$57.2 million
WFAN/New York
$54 million
KIIS/Los Angeles
$52.8 million
WXRK/New York*
$52.5 million
WGN-AM/Chicago
$52.4 million
Source: BIAfn. *Became WFNY (Talk) in January

Wednesday, April 05, 2006

Clear Channel offer a million to the Feds

Clear Channel offers to settle payola case with FCC
Web Posted: 04/05/2006 12:00 AM CDT
Sanford Nowlin
Express-News Business Writer

San Antonio-based Clear Channel Communications Inc. has offered to pay $1 million to settle a Federal Communications Commission probe into recording-industry payola, a company official said Tuesday.
Andrew Levin, Clear Channel's chief legal officer, said the company is talking to the commission to settle an eight-month-old investigation into whether radio broadcasters took illegal contributions from record companies to increase their play of specific songs.
"We're willing to pay a reasonable amount to put this matter behind us," Levin said. "We want to go back to focusing on our business and not on ancient history."
Clear Channel, CBS Radio, Entercom Communications and Citadel Broadcasting Corp., four of the nation's largest radio broadcasters, are in talks with the FCC to settle its probe, said people familiar with the discussions who asked not to be named.
However, those people also said at least one FCC commissioner, Democrat Jonathan Adelstein, isn't satisfied with the companies' settlement offers and wants them to pay stiffer financial penalties. A spokesman for Adelstein was unavailable for comment.
Officials of CBS Radio and Entercom declined to comment on the FCC probe, while Citadel officials were not available at press time Tuesday.
News of the talks comes as New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer conducts a separate payola investigation.
Both the FCC and Spitzer are looking into concerns that radio stations may have taken cash and goods in exchange for increased spins of particular songs, a practice that's been illegal since the late 1950s.
Clear Channel's Levin said his company has cooperated with both probes, having turned over thousands of pages of documents.
The company two years ago cut ties with independent promoters that music labels hire to boost radio exposure so it could "avoid the appearance of impropriety." In October, it completed an internal payola investigation, firing and penalizing several employees for violating pay-for-play rules.
However, Levin said authorities have sought information predating its internal efforts to crack down on payola.
"Just because we're the largest radio company doesn't mean we have the largest violations," Levin said. "We have been a model for the industry in terms of trying to put a stop to this practice."
The FCC last fined a broadcaster for engaging in payola in 2000 when it fined Clear Channel $8,000 for not disclosing payments it received to boost airplay of a Bryan Adams song.
Spitzer has blasted the FCC for negotiating settlements with the broadcasters, on Monday saying that the move would undercut his case.
Record companies Sony BMG and Warner Music Group together have paid $15 million to settle with Spitzer, and his office last month filed a lawsuit against Entercom alleging it accepted improper payments in exchange for airplay.
Previously, Spitzer had criticized the FCC for acting too slowly on the matter.
"Any time Spitzer can get $5 million and $10 million from these record companies in his investigation, you have to wonder why the FCC would let Clear Channel pay $1 million," said Paul Porter, whose activist group Industry Ears has criticized Clear Channel and other broadcasters.
But radio-industry analysts said they're not particularly concerned about the probe or a potential settlement, adding that Clear Channel, which owns 1,200 stations, faces much larger challenges as it faces competition from satellite radio and other entertainment sources.
Settling the investigation, they add, may just be a routine part of doing business.
"In the whole scheme of Clear Channel issues, this one is at the bottom of the list," said Michael Nathanson, who follows the company for Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. in New York. "For you and me, $1 million is a lot of money, but not for them."
snowlin@express-news.net
BAHRAM MARK SOBHANI/STAFF -->spitzer -->The FCC last levied a payola fine in 2000 when it fined Clear Channel $8,000 over payments to boost airplay of a Bryan Adams song. -->
Online at: http://www.mysanantonio.com/business/stories/MYSA040506.1E.payolaprobe.3555972.html

Monday, April 03, 2006

NY Daily News Industry Ears

Stanley Crouch is a columnist, novelist, essayist, critic and television commentator. He has served since 1987 as an artistic consultant at Lincoln Center and is a co-founder of the department known as Jazz at Lincoln Center. In 1993, he received both the Jean Stein Award from the American Academy of Arts and Letters and a MacArthur Foundation grant. He is now working on a biography of Charlie Parker. Email: scrouch@ edit.nydailynews.com


Merchants of filth have worthy foe
You can't keep a good woman down, and you can't get an intelligent one to stay silent when the issue is the moral pollution of young people. One can only come to that conclusion when speaking with Lisa Fager, president and co-founder of Industry Ears, a new think tank of broadcast and music industry professionals that describes itself as "dedicated to revealing truth and promoting justice in the media." That's a mouthful. Does it mean weeping rivers over the execution of a convicted murderer like Tookie Williams?
No. Fager wants to clean up what she sees as irresponsible activity in the media, with a particular emphasis on the detrimental effects of hip hop. Her central concern is the promotion of sexual material to underage children and the way this material encourages irresponsible sexual behavior.
"You would never know," she says, "that the largest group of new HIV cases just happens to be young black women between the ages of 15 and 24. This airheaded material desensitizes them to such an extent that they do not know how to protect themselves. Besides vulgarity, there are lethal components to this problem."
Some defend hip hop as the expression of an ethnic culture on the grounds of free speech and artistic freedom - and this con sounds noble - but if these illiterates with gold and diamonds in their teeth found that reading the Ten Commandments over hip-hop beats made money, they would search the Bible for fresh "lyrics."
Fager would settle for the FCC enforcing the law - coming down, for example, on urban black radio stations that violate regulations by playing questionable material before 10 p.m. "Part of the job of the legal system," she says, "is to protect our children from predators."
Censorship is not Fager's goal, and she does not believe that merely attacking vulgar entertainers is the answer. "If NBC had shown a porno film like 'Debbie Does Dallas' at 4:30 in the afternoon, we wouldn't be going after the star of the movie, we would be going after NBC."
I think the millionaires who push this dung have met their match, because Fager is a young woman who has worked in the recording industry and knows her way around the mass media. She cannot be dismissed as a grandmother who doesn't know what's happening.
Importantly, Fager has no fear of being accused of "hating" the black lower class or trying to kill a golden goose. Those accusations may be tired, but they work on far too many black academics and middle-class black people.
"I do not believe we are supposed to sit still while young women are dehumanized, infected with HIV and abused by young men programmed to think of women as nothing but sex toys," she says. "That's immoral and cowardly."
Lisa Fager is another example of American luck. Just when we think the dogs will win out, the dog catcher turns the corner. The howls will eventually be replaced by whimpers. Originally published on April 3, 2006

Thursday, March 30, 2006

Retail Music Industry Battles Extinction

Retail Music Industry Battles Extinction

In a period of lackluster sales, illegal downloading isn't the only factor affecting the depressed music industry. Disgruntled consumers have contributed significantly to the decline in retail music sales. Retail music sales, valued at $12.5 billion in 2005, are predicted to fall to $10.5 billion by 2010, according to a recent Mintel report. The major labels have been quick to blame consumers, but slow to listen to their needs."The growing distance between the music industry and its consumer is due to a number of factors," said Justin De Santis, analyst for Mintel. "These include lawsuits against individual consumers, payola practices, and, most recently, restrictive use of digital rights management."Music labels have a negative stigma to overcome, brought on by battles against illegal downloaders, radio "pay-for-play" scandals and homogeneous artist offerings on radio stations. The introduction of iTunes and similar sites has slowed the decay of music retail sales, but it has not stopped it. Even though technology is starting to work for the industry rather than against it, labels still face the challenge of meeting the demands of a diverse consumer marketplace.In an effort to keep up with the digital marketplace, industry leaders have marketed artists to sell single songs rather than complete albums. This new marketing strategy has contributed to the lack of strong up-and-coming musical talent in the marketplace that exhibit "staying power," such as legendary iconic artists like Prince, the Beatles, or U2.While illegal downloading has hurt the industry, big labels have relied on obsolete strategies for over a decade and have been late in exploiting emerging technologies. As a result, the bond between independent artists and their fans have become stronger. Although the music industry is just starting to use digital distribution to its advantage, overall sales will continue to decline unless companies learn to adapt more quickly to changing technologies.According to De Santis, "The current renaissance of underground media has further driven the consumer away from the major labels and has contributed to the downturn in their sales."

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Payola at Public Radio Too

Public Radio Payola; Scandal shakes public radio
Monday March 20 2006
Scandal shakes public radio
BY MARYANNE GEORGE and JOHN SMYNTEK
FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER

The sedate, urbane world of public broadcasting was rattled Thursday as prosecutors charged three former employees of Michigan Public Media with illegally accepting golf club memberships, Persian rugs, airline tickets and massages in exchange for on-air considerations at the state's top public radio station. Each of the men -- current WDET-FM general manager Michael Coleman, Jeremy Nordquist and Justin Ebright -- was charged by Washtenaw County prosecutors in Ann Arbor with embezzlement of under $20,000 while working at Michigan Public Media-controlled WUOM-FM (91.7). Each could face up to five years in prison if convicted. An internal audit also found sloppy recordkeeping, excessive bonuses and expense-account fraud that totaled more than $50,000 from July 2001 to December 2005, said Timothy Slottow, University of Michigan's chief financial officer. U-M owns and runs Michigan Public Media. WDET (101.9) and WUOM are the major public radio stations in Michigan, and public radio has long had a trustworthy image of being above the kind of influence-peddling that has occasionally tarnished commercial radio. The charges shocked listeners of the National Public Radio affiliates. "This is a sad revelation for Detroit, which has functioned as Michigan's cultural engine for so long," said public radio listener Willie Northway of Ann Arbor. "The talk and news offered by Michigan Radio is an invaluable service to the community." Coleman, who left Michigan Public Media as deputy director last year to be general manager at WDET and who has made several controversial programming changes in his new job, remains in his position, said Louis Lessem, vice president and general counsel for Wayne State University, which owns the station. "We know very little about the charge, other than that it has been made," said Lessem, adding that Coleman is not on administrative leave. Coleman, 40, of Ypsilanti did not return calls for comment Thursday. His lawyer, Gregory Dodd of Ypsilanti, could not be reached Thursday evening. WDET listeners who have pilloried Coleman for dumping music programming for talk and news blasted him Thursday after hearing the news. "While I don't wish ill will on anyone, for some reason this does not surprise me," said Dean Dauphinais of Grosse Pointe. Slottow said listener donations to WUOM, which last year put about $2.2 million into the radio station's $5.5-million overall budget, were not part of the alleged embezzlement. "Although we didn't discover these problems as quickly as we would have if stronger operational and oversight controls were in place, we did discover them and are taking immediate corrective action," he said. In-kind donations are common for public broadcasting but typically items donated are then sold to fund the stations. The allegations came to light after Donovan Reynolds, the former director of Michigan Public Media, alerted U-M officials about business practices at WUOM that concerned him. He resigned March 1, saying that although he was not implicated, the improprieties occurred under his watch. Recent Arbitron ratings show WUOM is the most popular radio station in Ann Arbor. The station raised more than $900,000 during its fall fund-raiser. Its spring fund-raiser is set to begin March 31. Nordquist, 28, of Saline and Ebright, 35, of Whitmore Lake also each face a charge of conspiracy to embezzle under $20,000, which carries a maximum 5-year prison term upon conviction. Nordquist was an account executive for Michigan Public Media who left the station Jan. 25. Ebright was development director for Michigan Radio, which is part of Michigan Public Media. He left in November. Ebright's lawyer, Dan Geherin of Ann Arbor, said the central question is whether his client broke the law by accepting any of the items. Nordquist's attorney, Tom Moors of Ypsilanti, said his client maintains his innocence. All three men were released Thursday morning on $10,000 personal bond each.

Arbitron radio reach

Arbitron: Radio Reaches More Than 230 Million People

Over the course of a week, radio reaches 93% of all persons 12 years of age and older. Additionally, Arbitron notes that nearly 184 million people, or 74% of all persons 12+, tune to radio on a Saturday or Sunday. Morning drive continues to attract the most listeners, while afternoon drive is just behind in total audience. Teens and young adults up to age 24 continue to embrace radio, with 92% of persons 12-17 and 92% of persons 18-24 tuning in at least one station during a given day.
Radio listening continues to be found most in the car, followed by at-home listening and at-work listening. Speaking of at-work listening, 96% of working women tune to radio weekly.
The estimates are based on data compiled by Arbitron's RADAR national audience measurement service. RADAR 88 will be released by Arbitron on Monday.

Monday, March 13, 2006

Radio One freezes playlist reacting to a Satire

-----Original Message----- From: Mary Catherine Sneed
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 1:33 PM

To: Program Directors; Marsha Meadows; General Managers; James Henderson Subject:

Fw: VP of Programming of BET, Stephen Hill Tells It All

Poor Laffy Taffy!!!!! --------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld

-----Original Message-----
From: Linda Vilardo To: Alfred Liggins; Mary Catherine Sneed
Sent: Tue Mar 07 13:01:45 2006
Subject: FW: VP of Programming of BET, Stephen Hill Tells It All

-----Original Message-----
From: Sundria Lake
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 1:00 PM

To: John Jones; Linda Vilardo
Subject: FW: VP of Programming of BET, Stephen Hill Tells It All _____ Playahata Times: Entertainment Section

WEB EXCLUSIVE VP of Programming of BET, Stephen Hill Tells It All On Tavis Smiley
By Kelly Hudlin

During a recent taping of the "Tavis Smiley Show", VP of Programming of BET, Stephen Hill tells it all. Hill claims the ongoing probe by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, coupled with his reconnection to his faith in Jesus Christ led to this most revealing interview. Hill entered into a plea agreement with the New York Attorney Generals office, that allows him to keep an estimated $700,000 dollars, in illegal payments. Hill controlled the playlist for the entire network. Spitzer's investigation covered a five year period, beginning with Hill's move from MTV in 1999. BET is currently in 77 million homes.

Tavis Smiley once again shows his journalistic skills in this exclusive 30 minute interview. Stephen Hill reveals that when he first made the switch to MTV he was instructed by Bob Johnson "to whiten the network up " . Hill knew he was brought to BET due to the imminent sale to MTV parent company Viacom. The transition was easy Hill said "I simply copied MTV show's like TRL and Tom Green, 106 and Park was a no-brainer and 'Hits from the Street's' were done with low budgets, Bob loved it".

Hill admits his problem was catering to the Urban market. Hill broke down in tears and admitted "Destiny's Child and "Bills, Bills Bills" is his all time favorite but ironically was the beginning of his lavish life of payola. Hill admits "I knew it was time to come clean, after I moved D4l's "Laffy Taffy" up BET'S charts" he was bound to get caught. Spitzer's office planted D4L's "Laffy Taffy" as a nationwide sting, Hill along with over fifteen hundred programmers took cash payments to make D4L the most paid for song in the history of radio. “I remember when I heard the song, I laughed" Hill said the lyrics were great but the drum machine was not a Kevin Liles track!

Hill decided to tell all in a plea agreement and now spends 40 hours a week with his renewed Jehovah Witness faith preaching door to door against sexuality in New Jersey. Stephen Hill admitted that Bob Johnson and Viacom know that BET's core audience will fall for anything. "Radio and Video are about making money, developing stars and content is long gone. Hill told Tavis Smiley that the "industry has run amuck, pay for play is the rule now and I am tired of playing Kunta for Jimmy Iovine and the rest of the industry". Tavis during the final minutes of this must see interview asked the Brown University Alumnus, "You have three pictures on your desk, Tiger, OJ and Michael Jackson, which one of those stars are your favorite"? Find out that and more when Tavis Smiley interviews Stephen Hill, VP of Programming on Friday March 31, 2006 on PBS.

BET reacts to Satire

From: GwendolynQuinn@aol.com [mailto:GwendolynQuinn@aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 3:50 PMTo:
GwendolynQuinn@aol.com
Subject: Check out Playahata.com
-- March Satire -- BET & Payola
Dear People:
I sent this out the other day to a few people. It's not true and as myfriend Tracy stated "it's a tasteless hoax." I hate sending out messingstuff. Scroll down and read. See link below.Playahata.com- - February Satire<http://www.playahata.com/pages/satires/satire_current.htm>


***See note to me from Michael Lewellen: And there is zero truth to it. If you read the original transmission,the copy is identified as satire in the heading. But as people havemoved this around the Internet, for some reason that little key fact hasbeen left off the e-mail.Good to see you last night in DC.

Take Care,Michael Lewellen-----------------

Forwarded Message: Subj: Check out Playahata.com- - February Satire Date: 3/12/2006 11:39:29 A.M. Eastern Standard Time From: NYCJORDAN23 To: GwendolynQuinn Playahata.com- - February Satire<http://www.playahata.com/pages/satires/satire_current.htm>

This was a tasteless hoax...
Gwendolyn Quinn President GQ Media & Public Relations, Inc.
1650 Broadway Suite 1011
New York, New York 10019
212-765-7910 (office)
212-765-7905 (fax)
gwendolynquinn@aol.com
***Gwendolyn QuinnFounder and Editorial DirectorThe AAPRC (The African-American Public Relations Collective) andThe AAPRC Monthly
1650 BroadwaySuite 1011
New York, New York 10019
212-765-7910 (office)
212-765-7905 (fax)
gwendolynquinn@aol.com

***Gwendolyn QuinnFounder and Creative DirectorThe Songwriting Seriesc/o A Queen Production, Inc.1650 BroadwaySuite 1011New York, New York 10019212-765-7874 (office)212-765-7905 (fax)gwendolynquinn@aol.com files from your system.Thank you.

NY TIMES on news study


The New York TimesMarch 13, 2006

Study Finds More News Media Outlets, Covering Less News

By KATHARINE Q. SEELYE

The third annual review of the state of American journalism found that while there were more media outlets this year than ever, they were covering less news.The review was conducted by the Project for Excellence in Journalism, an institute affiliated with the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and financed by the Pew Charitable Trusts.As part of the review, a special study looked at how a variety of outlets, including newspapers, television, radio and the Internet, covered a single day's worth of news and concluded that there was enormous repetition and amplification of just two dozen stories. Moreover, it said, "the incremental and even ephemeral nature of what the media define as news is striking."On May 11, 2005, a date that was chosen randomly, Congress was debating the appointment of John Bolton as ambassador to the United Nations, the actor Macaulay Culkin was testifying in Michael Jackson's molestation trial and car bombs in Iraq killed 79 people.On that day, the study said, " Google News offers access within two clicks to 14,000 stories, but really they are accounts of just 24 news events."The coverage offered by 57 media outlets was examined in depth in three cities (Houston, Milwaukee and Bend, Ore., which were randomly chosen from lists of cities of different size and geographical location) and showed certain shared characteristics depending on the medium.Print and the evening network news, for example, focused on the violence in Iraq, a false alarm in Washington involving a small plane that violated restricted air space, and protests in Afghanistan.Cable television and the morning news programs highlighted Mr. Jackson's trial and a murder in Illinois; local television and radio produced a steady diet of weather, traffic and local crime.The blogosphere, meanwhile, shrugged off most of the breaking news, focusing largely on broader, longer-term issues."Contrary to the charge that the blogosphere is purely parasitic," the study said, bloggers raised new issues. But they did almost no original reporting: only 1 percent of the posts that day involved a blogger interviewing someone else and only 5 percent involved some other original work, such as examining documents.Cable news was the "shallowest" and most "ephemeral" of the media, the study said. Newspapers, which are the biggest news-gathering organizations, covered the most topics, provided the most extensive sourcing and provided the most angles on particular events, it said, "though perhaps in language and sourcing tilted toward elites."Many of the national broadcast reports quoted the same few people."More coverage, in other words, does not always mean greater diversity of voices," the study said. "Consuming the news continuously does not mean being better informed."Tom Rosenstiel, director of the project, said that reporters seemed to be increasingly shunted off to an isolated area while covering events, as they were during the recent mining disaster in West Virginia, giving them little first-hand access."The irony is that having more reporters doesn't mean more coverage," he said. "It means more reporters crowded into one corner of the scene."

Copyright 2006The New York Times Company[] []

Kevin Taglang Senior Policy AnalystEditor, Communications-related Headlines Benton FoundationCommunications in the Public Interest

1625 K Street, NW 11th Floor

Washington, DC 20006headlines@benton.orgwww.benton.org

Thursday, March 09, 2006

WHUR Syndicating failure?

WHUR Gets An Earful for Axing Show
By Paul FarhiWashington Post Staff WriterThursday, March 9, 2006; Page C01
Radio-listening habits die hard. Just ask WHUR, which is discovering what happens when management gets between the audience and its favorite morning show.
Since dumping its popular morning team and replacing it this week with comedian Steve Harvey's syndicated program, the District radio station (96.3 FM) has been deluged with complaints by the hundreds. The backlash has inspired calls for a boycott of the station, which is owned by Howard University and has been among the highest-rated in the market.
var technorati = new Technorati() ;
technorati.setProperty('url','http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/08/AR2006030802485_Technorati.html') ;
technorati.article = new item('WHUR Gets An Earful for Axing Show','http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/08/AR2006030802485.html','Radio-listening habits die hard. Just ask WHUR, which is discovering what happens when management gets between the audience and its favorite morning show.','Paul Farhi') ;
document.write( technorati.getDisplaySidebar() );
#delicious_display {
display:none ;
color:#333333 ;
background-color:#EEEEEE ;
padding:4px ;
padding-top:0px ;
border:1px dotted #0D3159 ;
}
Save & Share
Tag This Article
Saving options
1. Save to description: Headline (required) Byline
2. Save to notes (255 character max): Blurb
3. Tag This Article

setTimeout('update_delicious_form(delicious_cookie)',1)
The cancellation of WHUR's "The Real D.C. Morning Show" raises a broader question: What's become of "local" programming in a medium that has long traded on its community ties and good-neighbor image?
Critics of WHUR's decision say that Harvey's show -- starring one of the "Kings of Comedy," who had a WB sitcom for years -- originates from New York and is heard in a handful of other U.S. cities. In that regard, it's little different from other syndicated radio shows, such as National Public Radio's "Morning Edition," or programs hosted by such personalities as Tom Joyner, Don Imus and Rush Limbaugh. Such syndicated fare has been blamed for destroying radio's "localism" and for its homogenization, with sound-alike stations from coast to coast.
As its name implied, "The Real D.C. Morning Show" was a hometown production. It featured four hosts -- Tony Richards, Sharon "TC" Pitt, George Willborn and Herman Washington -- who discussed local personalities, issues and news, and took music requests and calls from residents. The station's promos even subtly mocked the syndicated competition by bragging that the show was "not live via satellite, but live."
As of last month, however, it no longer was. WHUR -- a for-profit station despite its nonprofit parentage -- ended "Real D.C.'s" five-year run without an on-air announcement. Harvey's program, airing 6 to 10 a.m., began Monday.
Since then, outrage.
A message board maintained by Pitt ( http://www.sistacircle.com/ ) has been filling up with denunciations of WHUR's management and notes of support for the fired hosts -- about 2,500 combined as of yesterday. Pitt, meanwhile, said yesterday she would "go back to the station in a minute" if asked. "I was born and raised here," she said. "This was my dream job."
Separately, an anonymous listener has collected about 400 "signatures" for an online petition that states, "We, the former listeners of WHUR, will boycott the station until our voices are heard and until The Real DC Morning Show has returned."
Tonya Brewington, a regular listener of the D.C. program, called WHUR's decision to cancel the show "jarring" because of the change in tone -- Harvey's show often emphasizes edgier humor, compared with "Real D.C.'s" more gentle, folksy style.
"I think it's a very bad choice," said Brewington, a Web designer who lives in the District. "I think the people who listen to [the program] are not the same audience for Steve Harvey. . . . It was more of a community show. You're not going to find out what happened in D.C. the night before by listening to a show out of New York. It's a sad commentary for a radio station that's associated with a prestigious university."
Several people at the station, including program director Dave Dickinson, said they were not authorized to talk about the matter publicly. They referred a reporter to Jim Watkins, WHUR's general manager. Watkins did not return multiple requests for comment yesterday.
The decision might look puzzling in light of the program's ratings. The show ranked third in its time period (behind top-rated WMMJ and WPGC) among adult listeners ages 25 to 54, according to Arbitron Co.'s most recent quarterly survey. In other words, it was a strong performer during radio's most competitive time of the day among the listeners most sought by radio advertisers.
But that also means WHUR ranked third in a long-running four-way battle for supremacy among African American listeners. The big four "urban" stations in Washington regularly split this audience. And all three of WHUR's main competitors have superstar hosts in the morning: WMMJ (102.3 FM) features Joyner, who formerly was heard on WHUR; WPGC (95.5 FM) carries Donnie Simpson; and WKYS (93.9 FM) airs Russ Parr's show.
Of those shows, only Simpson's focuses on the Washington area. Joyner broadcasts from the Midwest. Parr, based in the D.C. area, tailors his show for a national audience.
Programs that seek to attract African American listeners often have emphasized connections to their community to set them apart from mainstream stations, said Charlie Sislen, a partner in Research Director Inc., an Annapolis-based consulting firm. "To not have a local morning show is very surprising," said Sislen, whose clients include WPGC.
WHUR, however, racked up big ratings with Joyner's syndicated show until it lost that program to rival WMMJ in August 2000.
Sean Ross, a radio consultant with Edison Media Research, said Harvey's program has performed well on stations that have picked it up since it began syndication six months ago. "He's certainly the high-impact alternative to Joyner at the moment," said Ross of the 50-year-old Harvey. "Joyner hasn't stopped being Joyner, but [Harvey] is interesting. His celebrity will help him pull in a younger audience."
As for WHUR, Ross said, it was "prepared to do what everyone has to do to build a morning show until a compelling option came along."

Wednesday, March 08, 2006

Entercom hit with payola lawsuit

Wednesday, March 8, 2006
Entercom Hit With Payola Lawsuit

In a suit filed today in New York State's Supreme Court, New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer alleges that Entercom traded airtime for trips, gifts, promotional items and other forms of payments. The suit also charges that Entercom staff solicited and accepted payments from record label execs and developed internal programs — which were supported and directed by senior management — to sell airtime to labels.
The lawsuit included 67 pages of attachments that detailed communications between Entercom station staff and record label execs regarding the alleged illegal activities.
Spitzer says, "By accepting secret payments in exchange for airtime, Entercom compromised its radio programming and violated state and federal laws. What makes this case especially egregious is the extent to which senior management viewed control of the airways as an opportunity to garner illegal payments from record labels."
Meanwhile, Spitzer is also challenging the FCC to step up its payola enforcement. "Almost a year after payola was exposed in significant detail, the FCC has yet to respond in any meaningful way," he says. "The agency's inaction is especially disappointing given the pervasive nature of this problem and its corrosive impact on the entertainment industry."
Entercom did not immediately return an R&R call seeking comment.

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Playahata Satire

March Satire
?
Playahata Times: Entertainment Section?

WEB EXCLUSIVEVP of Programming of BET, Stephen Hill Tells It All On Tavis Smiley

By Kelly Hudlin
During a recent taping of the "Tavis Smiley Show", VP of Programming of BET, Stephen Hill tells it all. Hill claims the ongoing probe by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, coupled with his reconnection to his faith in Jesus Christ led to this most revealing interview.
Hill entered into a plea agreement with the New York Attorney Generals office, that allows him to keep and estimated $700,000 dollars, in illegal payments. Hill controlled the playlist for the entire network. Spitzer's investigation covered a five year period, beginning with Hill's move from MTV in 1999. BET is currently in 77 million homes.
Tavis Smiley once again shows his journalistic skills in this exclusive 30 minute interview. Stephen Hill reveals that when he first made the switch to MTV he was instructed by Bob Johnson "to whiten the network up" Hill knew he was brought to BET due to the imminent sale to MTV parent company Viacom. The transition was easy Hill said "I simply copied MTV show's like TRL and Tom Green, 106 and Park was a no-brainer and 'Hits from the Street's' were done with low budgets, Bob loved it".
Hill admits his problem was catering to the Urban market. Hill broke down in tears and admitted "Destiny's Child and "Bills, Bills Bills" is his all time favorite but ironically was the beginning of his lavish life of payola. Hill admits "I knew it was time to come clean, after I moved D4l's "Laffy Taffy" up BET'S charts" he was bound to get caught.
Spitzer's office planted D4L's "Laffy Taffy" as a nationwide sting, Hill along with over fifteen hundred programmers took cash payments to make D4L the most paid for song in the history of radio. "I remember when I heard the song, I laughed" Hill said the lyrics were great but the drum machine was not a Kevin Liles track! Hill decided to tell all in a plea agreement and now spends 40 hours a week with his renewed Jehovah Witness faith preaching door to door against sexuality in New Jersey.
Stephen Hill admitted that Bob Johnson and Viacom, know that BET's core audience will fall for anything. "Radio and Video are about making money, developing stars and content is long gone. Hill told Tavis Smiley that the "industry has run amuck, pay for play is the rule now and I am tired of playing Kunta for Jimmy Iovine and the rest of the industry".
Tavis during the final minutes of this must see interview asked the Brown University Alumnus, "You have three pictures on your desk, Tiger, OJ and Michael Jackson, which one of those stars are your favorite"? Find out that and more when Tavis Smiley interviews Stephen Hill, VP of Programming on Friday March 31, 2006 on PBS.
?
Kelly Hudlin is a freelance writer, from Chicago, best known for his short film "I saw it, I seen it, then I did it".
?
*Past satires can be found under the Directory Link below*

Monday, March 06, 2006

RADIO ONE STOCK PROBLEMS

Radio One Takes a Long View
By Jerry KnightMonday, March 6, 2006; Page D01
Back when Radio One Inc. began buying radio stations, hip-hop was unheard music.
Not unheard of, but unheard on the radio in many major cities.

Radio One put hip-hop and other genres of urban music on the nation's airwaves. Buying underperforming radio stations and turning them into urban-music machines, the Lanham-based company became the largest black-owned, black-oriented radio station group in the country

Today, hip-hop is everywhere. Yesterday's obscure rappers are today's movie stars -- Mos Def upstaged Bruce Willis in "16 Blocks," one of last weekend's movie openings. Stations catering to white kids play what was once considered the blackest music since the blues.
That is one of the problems facing Radio One.
As urban music has gone mainstream, Radio One stock has lost close to two-thirds of its value in the past two years. The shares hit a five-year low of $8.13 on Thursday and closed 9 cents higher on Friday.

The biggest losers in that slide have been Radio One Chairman Alfred C. Liggins III and his mother, Cathy Hughes, the longtime Washington broadcaster who founded the company 25 years ago. Together, their holdings of four classes of Radio One stock add up to an 18 percent stake in the company. Even at today's depressed stock price, their share is worth about $155 million. But since they control the majority of the voting stock, their stake is probably much more valuable than that -- particularly if the company were to be sold.

Radio One's stock price has fallen because the company's original strategy of picking up out-of-favor radio stations on the cheap and giving them new music, new audiences and new advertisers has run its course.

"They have applied their specialty, which is the urban niche, and they have brought these stations up to a solid operating level,'' said analyst Maurice C. McKenzie of Friedman, Billings, Ramsey Group, an Arlington investment firm. "At this point, they are struggling with a challenging radio environment."

There are few bargain radio stations to be had these days. Few cities don't already have stations following what was once the innovative format of Radio One. And the core urban-music franchise is fragmenting, with Latino youths switching from "conventional" hip-hop to the Caribbean-influenced sound known as reggaeton.
Instead of buying more stations, Radio One has been buying back its stock. That can increase earnings per share and sometimes the stock price but often can sacrifice expansion opportunities.
Despite repurchasing $78 million worth of shares, Radio One stock has done badly even by radio standards, McKenzie noted. The stock underperformed the industry last year and continues to do so.
Not that the radio industry has been doing well. Listeners are being lured away by the Internet, iPods and the expanded choices offered by District-based XM Satellite Radio and its New York rival, Sirius Satellite Radio. (Radio One programs one of XM's 100-plus channels.) Stocks of satellite broadcasters aren't doing better than those of the earthlings. XM is down 21 percent so far this year, Sirius 25 percent.
In that environment, radio revenue is growing only 3 to 5 percent a year. Radio One's revenue grew by a scant one-tenth of 1 percent in the fourth quarter of last year and could actually fall this quarter, analysts said.


Radio's problem, Liggins said on a recent conference call, is that "we're not creating new advertisers, which as an industry we need to do."
The frustration of Liggins and other Radio One executives blared as a backbeat during last month's hour-long session with analysts. They sounded frustrated trying to make money in a mature industry, frustrated by the cutthroat competition for advertising dollars, frustrated by what's happened to Radio One's stock price, frustrated by Wall Street's unwillingness to embrace the company's diversification into television broadcasting and program syndication.
Radio One's most promising move beyond its radio roots is TV One, a joint venture with Comcast Corp. Radio One owns a 35 percent stake in the TV venture, which aims to rival Black Entertainment Television, a network created by Robert L. Johnson, Washington's most successful minority entrepreneur.

Expanding slowly across Comcast's vast web of cable networks, TV One is on track to generate $80 million a year in cash flow within five years, Liggins said.
But Wall Street gives the company little credit for its move into TV, even though the strategy was suggested by media industry investment bankers.

"We played the game just like we were supposed to," Liggins lamented. "We ended up with the stock price where it is, based on doing everything we were told to do."
Becoming a minor partner in one of the several bidders for the Washington Nationals franchise and making an effort to break into movie distribution with an obscure indie film also generated a lot of skepticism.

More interesting to investors is Radio One's partnership with talk show host Tom Joyner, the nation's top black radio personality. Joyner's show is broadcast on several Radio One stations and syndicated to stations owned by other companies.

The partnership in turn is lining up other black talk-radio hosts -- Al Sharpton among them -- to build the first talk-show network aimed at black audiences. Distributing programming isn't considered as good a business as running stations, but black talk radio is a wide-open field, just as urban music was a decade ago.
Also regarded as a promising diversification possibility is Radio One's effort to develop a major Internet portal for African Americans. Others have tried, none with great financial success.

Page 3 of 3 <

Radio One Takes a Long View
Analysts generally applaud efforts to find new ways to reach Radio One's audience. "Radio One is proactively capitalizing on this trend with its focus on becoming a multimedia powerhouse for the African American demographic," analysts at Wachovia Capital Markets LLC noted approvingly in a recent research report.
Nonetheless, Wachovia cut the stock's rating from "outperform" to "market perform, " the equivalent of a "hold" rating.

From talking to analysts and reading their research, it becomes clear that most agree on the prognosis for Radio One: It could be a good investment down the road, but the future is not now.
FBR's McKenzie, who has the equivalent of a "hold" rating on the stock, said: "Long-term, these diversifications could prove successful. But in the near term, we expect resource allocation to have a negative impact on the company's margins." In other words, it's going to cost money to get those new ventures off the ground, and in the meantime, profit will suffer.
Analysts at Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. say investors would get a quicker payoff if Radio One were sold. They express regret that Radio One's "management isn't overly concerned with short-term stock price."

Liggins dealt with that complaint during his February conference call. "We are more concerned about actually creating value than what the Street is going to think. They think three- to six-month return. I'm more concerned about how much more cash flow we're going to have in five years."
That's an attitude that ought to appeal to long-term investors -- if there are any left.
Jerry Knight's e-mail address isknightj@washpost.com

Friday, March 03, 2006

Payola

It is all time we all take a serious look at PAYOLA on a larger scale. For decades PAYOLA stood for illegal payouts to Program and Music Directors of individual stations nationwide. PAYOLA for decades let the little label or artist be heard, payouts could be as little as $100 or a free meal. For a longtime radio programmers prided themselves in breaking new artist first, by any means neccesary. Believe it, many acts at radio received airplay for nothing at all, for a longtime talent and content were important, variety and originality were important. How things have changed in the past 10 years is alarming.

The Corporate strangle hold has touched every sector of business, radio and video are no exception. The Telecomm Act of 1996 opened the flood gates to power takeovers from small owners or small groups. Wall Street stepped in and variety and localism ended almost overnight. With consolidation power is in your pocket, individual station playlist became national list. The price of PAYOLA quickly multiplied from one station to one nation. Conglomerates like Clear Channel quickly grew from 39 stations to over 1200. PAYOLA turned corporate and the record industry spent less time directed toward sustaining talent, and more time pumping huge dollars into music video. Out went variety and in went repitition. Imagine the record industry demanded more spins on titles from radio. Hell, they paided for promotions, trips, gifts and cash on corporate and individual levels. The Record industry was the new pimp, finally dictating on when, what and how many times radio played titles.

Unfortunately the deal makers in the recording industry got stuck on the gangsta phase of Hip Hop. Sex, violence, misogyny and drug titles dominate new titles and product. Like in past decades of disco & R&B the talent well has dried out. The continual "same songs" are done over and over again, each time losing steam and talent. Today's PAYOLA problem is the "hoe" Radio continues to play what the "pimp" continues to dictate. Although revenue at Radio and Records continue to decline the cats in the boardroom are still profiting. The children, teens and tweens think today's playlist are the Marvin Gaye's, Michael Jackson's, Bob Marley's Tupac's or Biggie's. Unfortunately the new cast members are named D4L, Ying Yang's and Young Jeezy.

Pay for play is a hell of a system, when you here it over and over again it works! Many young ears like it, believe it and others often buy it. PAYOLA is effective on the corporate level, because when you control the airwaves you control sales. PERIOD! Yes, there are always exceptions to the rule, just like there are mutiny's and revolotions, empires fall it is time to make some noise and let them know your tired of being played. It is all time we all take a serious look at PAYOLA on a larger scale. For decades PAYOLA stood for illegal payouts to Program and Music Directors of individual stations nationwide. PAYOLA for decades let the little label or artist be heard, payouts could be as little as $100 or a free meal. For a longtime radio programmers prided themselves in breaking new artist first, by any means neccesary. Believe it, many acts at radio received airplay for nothing at all, for a longtime talent and content were important, variety and originality were important.

How things have changed in the past 10 years is alarming. The Corporate strangle hold has touched every sector of business, radio and video are no exception. The Telecomm Act of 1996 opened the flood gates to power takeovers from small owners or small groups. Wall Street stepped in and variety and localism ended almost overnight. With consolidation power is in your pocket, individual station playlist became national list. The price of PAYOLA quickly multiplied from one station to one nation. Conglomerates like Clear Channel quickly grew from 39 stations to over 1200. PAYOLA turned corporate and the record industry spent less time directed toward sustaining talent, and more time pumping huge dollars into music video. Out went variety and in went repitition. Imagine the record industry demanded more spins on titles from radio. Hell, they paided for promotions, trips, gifts and cash on corporate and individual levels. The Record industry was the new pimp, finally dictating on when, what and how many times radio played titles.

Unfortunately the deal makers in the recording industry got stuck on the gangsta phase of Hip Hop. Sex, violence, misogyny and drug titles dominate new titles and product. Like in past decades of disco & R&B the talent well has dried out. The continual "same songs" are done over and over again, each time losing steam and talent. Today's PAYOLA problem is the "hoe" Radio continues to play what the "pimp" continues to dictate. Although revenue at Radio and Records continue to decline the cats in the boardroom are still profiting. The children, teens and tweens think today's playlist are the Marvin Gaye's, Michael Jackson's, Bob Marley's Tupac's or Biggie's. Unfortunately the new cast members are named D4L, Ying Yang's and Young Jeezy. Pay for play is a hell of a system, when you here it over and over again it works! Many young ears like it, believe it and others often buy it. PAYOLA is effective on the corporate level, because when you control the airwaves you control sales. PERIOD! Yes, there are always exceptions to the rule, just like there are mutiny's and revolotions, empires fall it is time to make some noise and let them know your tired of being played.

Record Label Price fixing?

Friday, March 3, 2006
DOJ Investigating Online Music Price Fixing

Vivendi Universal, Sony BMG, Universal Music Group and Warner Music Group are being investigated by the Department of Justice for possible collusion in setting prices for online music, the Wall Street Journal reports today.
DOJ spokeswoman Gina Talamona tells the WSJ that antitrust agents are "looking into the possibility of anticompetitive practices in the music-download industry." All four label groups have reportedly received or will soon receive "civil investigative demands" from the DOJ seeking information; the matter does not appear to be a criminal investigation.
New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer launched a similar probe in December of last year, sending subpoenas to all four major label groups in an attempt to find out if they colluded on setting wholesale prices for digital music. Most digital music — including songs sold on Apple's wildly popular iTunes service — sells for 99 cents a song, and online music retailers are believed to pay wholesale prices of 60 to 70 cents per song.
An EMI representative told R&R that the company had not received a subpoena as of this morning and declined to otherwise comment on the matter. R&R's calls to Sony BMG, Universal and Warner Music Group were not immediately returned.

Wednesday, February 22, 2006

Clear Channel revenues decline

Clear Channel Radio Revenues Down 6% For Q4

Clear ChannelRevenue fell 1% to $1.76 billion and radio revenue was off 6% to $909.4 million for CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS in fourth quarter 2005, the company reported TUESDAY. Profits rose from 2004's loss of $4.67 billion (loss of $8.15/share) to a gain of $461.6 million (86 cents/share), but excluding discontinued operations and major accounting charges that affected 2004's numbers, profits fell from 40 to 34 cents/share. The company's radio revenue decline was greater than the industry's pace of a 3% drop. Outdfoor advertising rose 7% to $734.6 million.

Thursday, February 16, 2006

Rep. Fred Upton wants to ease ownerships restrictions

Thursday, Feb. 16, 2006
Lawmaker Wants Radio Ownership Rules Relaxed

Rep. Fred Upton, a House Commerce Committee member and communications subcommittee chairman, has asked FCC Chairman Kevin Martin to launch a proceeding to raise the maximum number of stations one company can own in certain U.S. markets.
In a Feb. 9 letter, the Michigan Republican suggested that the ownership limit in markets with 60 or more stations be increased from eight to 10 stations. He also recommended that the limit in markets with 75 or more stations be raised to 12.
"A modest increase would not result in undue concentration," Upton said. "Even with such modest relaxation, radio will remain an industry with very diverse ownership that falls far short of a level of concentration that would be cause for concern." He also believes relaxing the rules could lead to more program diversity. "Owners would be able to experiment with new formats that improve service to underserved segments of the population, or bring a new service to the marketplace for the first time."
Upton also stressed that in just the 10 years since the rules were eased with the Telecommunications Act of 1996, new competitors have emerged to challenge radio. "If free terrestrial radio is to remain a healthy industry capable of fulfilling its public interest responsibilities while competing against an increasing number of competitors, it must be able to grow," said the congressman. "I believe that the modest increases discussed in this letter will provide room for that growth."
Upton repeated his call for relaxed radio ownership rules during a speech delivered Thursday at Washington, DC's Media Institute. He even suggested that the industry might be better off with no ownership limits. "Today's marketplace makes a compelling argument for simply eliminating local terrestrial broadcast ownership caps, except perhaps in the smallest markets," he said. "But those of you who know me understand that I am a pragmatist; such a step will not pass the test of politics in Washington, DC today. I am making a far more targeted proposal because modernization can and should get done with year."
Upton continued, "Setting aside for just a moment the competition from other media, especially satellite radio, there is absolutely no public good to justify the same local radio ownership cap for Cincinnati as for New York City, Chicago and Los Angeles. Let's remember that ownership diversity is only a proxy for viewpoint diversity; America's largest markets are certainly not lacking in diversity of perspective and entertainment."
Thursday, Feb. 16, 2006
Lawmaker Wants Radio Ownership Rules Relaxed

Rep. Fred Upton, a House Commerce Committee member and communications subcommittee chairman, has asked FCC Chairman Kevin Martin to launch a proceeding to raise the maximum number of stations one company can own in certain U.S. markets.
In a Feb. 9 letter, the Michigan Republican suggested that the ownership limit in markets with 60 or more stations be increased from eight to 10 stations. He also recommended that the limit in markets with 75 or more stations be raised to 12.
"A modest increase would not result in undue concentration," Upton said. "Even with such modest relaxation, radio will remain an industry with very diverse ownership that falls far short of a level of concentration that would be cause for concern." He also believes relaxing the rules could lead to more program diversity. "Owners would be able to experiment with new formats that improve service to underserved segments of the population, or bring a new service to the marketplace for the first time."
Upton also stressed that in just the 10 years since the rules were eased with the Telecommunications Act of 1996, new competitors have emerged to challenge radio. "If free terrestrial radio is to remain a healthy industry capable of fulfilling its public interest responsibilities while competing against an increasing number of competitors, it must be able to grow," said the congressman. "I believe that the modest increases discussed in this letter will provide room for that growth."
Upton repeated his call for relaxed radio ownership rules during a speech delivered Thursday at Washington, DC's Media Institute. He even suggested that the industry might be better off with no ownership limits. "Today's marketplace makes a compelling argument for simply eliminating local terrestrial broadcast ownership caps, except perhaps in the smallest markets," he said. "But those of you who know me understand that I am a pragmatist; such a step will not pass the test of politics in Washington, DC today. I am making a far more targeted proposal because modernization can and should get done with year."
Upton continued, "Setting aside for just a moment the competition from other media, especially satellite radio, there is absolutely no public good to justify the same local radio ownership cap for Cincinnati as for New York City, Chicago and Los Angeles. Let's remember that ownership diversity is only a proxy for viewpoint diversity; America's largest markets are certainly not lacking in diversity of perspective and entertainment."

Newsday Miss Jones

Pols, activists rap Hot 97's Jones --------------------
BY RAFER GUZMANSTAFF WRITER
February 16, 2006

Hot 97 radio host Miss Jones is under attack again - and this time, it's personal.A coalition of New York City Council members and community activists gathered on Manhattan's City Hall steps yesterday , calling for the firing of Tarsha Nicole Jones, known on-air as Miss Jones, and Hot 97 program director John Dimick . A crowd of about 30 people listened to speakers lambaste the radio personality."I've met Miss Jones," said councilman John Liu (D-Flushing). "Miss Jones actually has no personality whatsoever."The rally was sparked by a recent broadcast on Hot 97 (WQHT/97.1 FM) . A crowd of about 30 people listened to speakers lambaste the radio personality."I've met Miss Jones," said councilman John Liu (D-Flushing). "Miss Jones actually has no personality whatsoever."The rally was sparked by a recent broadcast on Hot 97 (WQHT/97.1 FM) in which Jones called Transit Workers Union President Roger Toussaint a "dumb coconut," an apparent reference to his Caribbean roots."I couldn't believe it ," said Fendi Williams, 14, a Brooklynite at the rally. "My father is of Caribbean descent."The coalition, R.E.A.C. Hip-Hop (Representing Education, Activism and Community Through Hip-Hop ), has been hounding Jones since her broadcast last year of the so-called "Tsunami Song," which mocked victims of the Southeast Asian tsunami. Jones was suspended for two weeks last year for playing the song. Yesterday's speakers ratcheted up their rhetoric, accusing Jones, who is black, of betraying her community and serving as a pawn to the white corporate executives at Emmis Communications, which owns Hot 97.Jones belongs in the same company as "blackface and Amos and Andy," said councilwoman Letitia James (D, WF -Brooklyn). "She is being used. She is nothing more than a tool."Several council members announced they were introducing a resolution to condemn Jones' remarks and promised their own investigation into the recent payola scandal that has rocked the radio and record industries.Calls to Hot 97 and Emmis were not returned. Copyright (c) 2006, Newsday, Inc.

Friday, February 10, 2006

Payola Investigation


Hundreds Of Stations Under Investigation By FCC In Payola Investigation
February 10, 2006
Though ABC News has delayed airing its Primetime Live story on Eliot Spitzer's payola investigation, it has revealed that the FCC is now investigating hundreds of radio stations around the country as part of the scandal. FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein told ABC News, "The FCC staff is working with voluminous evidence right now. It's a complicated and wide-ranging investigation." He added, "This is potentially the most widespread and flagrant violation of FCC rules in the history of American broadcasting. We've never seen evidence of such a systematic betrayal of the responsibility of broadcasters."
Spitzer himself told ABC News, "We have people in suits coming in with documents rather than cash payments under the table to a DJ."
Adelstein threatens the loss of stations' licenses through this investigation, saying, "I can't believe that radio stations are putting their licenses at risk. It seems to me they thought the FCC was asleep and they shot someone in front of the policeman. The policeman is obligated to act when evidence is so clear." He added, "While it's highly unusual for the FCC to pull licenses on first violation, depending on the severity that is one option that is available to us. These are criminal matters as well."
Commissioner Adelstein revealed that he has been in regular contact with Spitzer lately, and wants the FCC to handle the investigation, as opposed to just Spitzer and the state of New York. "We have a responsibility to get to the bottom of this. It's important that the FCC does its job and not let the states do it for us," he said.
ABC News also spoke to a number of industry stars at the Grammys earlier this week about payola, with none of them particularly surprised by the news. "Honestly, payola has existed since the beginning of the music business, so it's not like its some brand-new thing that never happened before," said Alicia Keys. Jessica Simpson's music has been mentioned in Spitzer's documents. Her father/manager Joe Simpson told ABC News, "All I know is we worked really hard to get the record on and it was as honest as I could be. So whatever happened above us, you know I have no answer for."
The episode of Primetime Live is now expected to air next Thursday, February 16.